Products
Products
Video Hosting
Upload and manage your videos in a centralized video library.
Image Hosting
Upload and manage all your images in a centralized library.
Galleries
Choose from 100+templates to showcase your media in style.
Video Messaging
Record, and send personalized video messages.
CincoTube
Create your own community video hub your team, students or fans.
Pages
Create dedicated webpages to share your videos and images.
Live
Create dedicated webpages to share your videos and images.
For Developers
Video API
Build a unique video experience.
DeepUploader
Collect and store user content from anywhere with our file uploader.
Solutions
Solutions
Enterprise
Supercharge your business with secure, internal communication.
Townhall
Webinars
Team Collaboration
Learning & Development
Creative Professionals
Get creative with a built in-suite of editing and marketing tools.
eCommerce
Boost sales with interactive video and easy-embedding.
Townhall
Webinars
Team Collaboration
Learning & Development
eLearning & Training
Host and share course materials in a centralized portal.
Sales & Marketing
Attract, engage and convert with interactive tools and analytics.
"Cincopa helped my Enterprise organization collaborate better through video."
Book a Demo
Resources
Resources
Blog
Learn about the latest industry trends, tips & tricks.
Help Centre
Get access to help articles FAQs, and all things Cincopa.
Partners
Check out our valued list of partners.
Product Updates
Stay up-to-date with our latest greatest features.
Ebooks, Guides & More
Customer Stories
Hear how we've helped businesses succeed.
Boost Campaign Performance Through Video
Discover how to boost your next campaign by using video.
Download Now
Pricing
Watch a Demo
Demo
Login
Start Free Trial
Benchmarking video quality involves objectively assessing the visual and auditory fidelity of video content using various industry-standard tools and methods. This ensures that videos meet specific quality thresholds, providing consistent and reliable playback experiences across devices and platforms. Key Metrics for Benchmarking Video Quality Before diving into the tools and methods, it’s essential to understand the key metrics used to assess video quality. These metrics quantify the perceptual quality and help in comparing different video files, codecs, or encoding parameters. Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) PSNR is a traditional metric that measures the quality of a video by comparing the original and compressed versions. It calculates the ratio between the maximum possible signal and the noise (errors introduced by compression or transmission), expressed in decibels (dB). A higher PSNR indicates better quality. ffmpeg -i original.mp4 -i compressed.mp4 -filter_complex psnr='psnr.log' -f null - This FFmpeg command compares the original and compressed videos and outputs the PSNR score to a log file. Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) SSIM measures the perceptual difference between two video sequences, focusing on luminance, contrast, and structure. Unlike PSNR, SSIM aligns more closely with human visual perception, making it a more accurate metric for subjective video quality assessment. Range : SSIM values range from 0 to 1, where 1 indicates perfect similarity between the original and compressed video. ffmpeg -i original.mp4 -i compressed.mp4 -filter_complex ssim='ssim.log' -f null - This FFmpeg command calculates SSIM between the original and compressed videos and logs the results. Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion (VMAF) VMAF is a modern metric developed by Netflix to evaluate video quality based on human perception. It combines multiple quality metrics into a single score that aligns better with how viewers perceive video quality, making it more reliable than PSNR or SSIM for real-world applications. Range : VMAF scores range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality. A score above 85 is generally considered 'excellent' quality. Bitrate Bitrate measures the amount of data used to encode a video per unit of time, typically expressed in kilobits per second (Kbps) or megabits per second (Mbps). While not directly a measure of visual quality, bitrate is closely related to video quality, especially in compressed formats. Higher bitrates often lead to better quality, although the relationship is not linear. Tools for Video Quality Benchmarking Several tools are available for objectively measuring video quality. These tools automate the assessment of various metrics and are critical for scaling quality tests across large video libraries or production pipelines. FFmpeg FFmpeg is a widely used command-line tool for video encoding, decoding, and processing. It includes functionality for calculating PSNR , SSIM , and VMAF values, making it an essential tool for video quality benchmarking. Example: Calculate SSIM between two video files using FFmpeg: ffmpeg -i original.mp4 -i compressed.mp4 -filter_complex ssim='ssim.log' -f null - VMAF (Netflix Open Source) VMAF is available as an open-source project, and Netflix provides both pre-trained models and instructions for evaluating video quality using this metric. Example: To use VMAF with FFmpeg, you can install the VMAF model and run: ffmpeg -i original.mp4 -i compressed.mp4 -filter_complex '[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model_path=vmaf_v0.6.1.pkl:log_path=vmaf_log.txt' -f null - Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG) Tools VQEG provides a set of objective quality assessment tools, primarily designed for research and academic purposes. These tools are widely used for validating new video quality metrics and for benchmarking video codecs. Example : VQEG offers test video datasets and software to evaluate perceptual video quality using multiple metrics like PSNR , SSIM , and VMAF . These tools are ideal for conducting standardized benchmarking. Elecard Video Quality Measurement Tool Elecard’s tool is designed to analyze video quality based on PSNR , SSIM , and other quality indicators. It is widely used in professional media environments to ensure that video content meets broadcast standards. Example : Elecard provides a graphical interface where users can load two video files and compare them using multiple quality metrics, which is useful for non-technical users or teams without coding expertise. Methods for Video Quality Benchmarking Once the tools are selected, it's important to establish a methodology for benchmarking video quality. The approach will depend on the use case (e.g., optimizing video encoding, comparing codecs, or assessing streaming quality). Below are common benchmarking methods used in the industry. Objective Testing Objective testing uses automated algorithms to assess video quality. It is fast, scalable, and ideal for large datasets. These algorithms are designed to compute quality metrics like PSNR , SSIM , and VMAF , which provide an approximation of the video quality. While effective in many cases, objective metrics may not always correlate perfectly with human perception, as they focus more on technical measurements rather than subjective viewing experiences. Example Code for Objective Testing (PSNR) ffmpeg -i original.mp4 -i compressed.mp4 -filter_complex psnr='psnr.log' -f null - Subjective Testing Subjective testing involves human viewers evaluating video quality based on visual and auditory cues. This method aims to simulate real-world experiences and is considered more accurate for understanding how viewers perceive quality. However, subjective testing is time-consuming, requires a controlled environment, and depends on the number of panelists involved, making it less scalable than objective testing. Viewer Panels : A group of participants rates the quality of videos on a predefined scale, usually considering factors like clarity, color accuracy, motion smoothness, and audio quality. Real-World Experience : Subjective testing takes into account the complexities of how people perceive video quality, including individual preferences and contextual factors like screen size and viewing distance. Encode-to-Encode Comparison In this method, videos are encoded using different settings (e.g., different bitrates or codecs), and the resulting files are compared using PSNR , SSIM , and VMAF metrics. This helps determine the best encoding settings for balancing quality and file size. Example : Compare H.264 and HEVC codecs to see which one offers better quality at a similar bitrate. Real-World Playback Testing This method involves testing video quality in real-world playback environments across different devices (e.g., mobile phones, TVs, and computers). It includes evaluating factors like buffering , stalling , and video quality degradation due to network conditions. Tools like HLS and DASH support this kind of testing by allowing for adaptive streaming assessments. Compression and Streaming Tests For videos streamed over the internet, adaptive bitrate streaming is commonly used. Benchmarking the impact of different compression methods (e.g., VP9 vs. HEVC ) on streaming performance and user experience is essential for understanding how different codecs and bitrates affect playback quality. What’s Next? Looking to operationalize video quality benchmarking at scale? Use Cincopa’s API to manage metric extraction, encoding comparisons, and automated quality scoring across your video pipeline. Integrate VMAF, SSIM, and PSNR checks into your CI workflows to evaluate each transcode iteration before deployment. Build dashboards to visualize quality trends by codec, resolution, or platform, and set thresholds to trigger alerts when quality drops.