Products
Products
Video Hosting
Upload and manage your videos in a centralized video library.
Image Hosting
Upload and manage all your images in a centralized library.
Galleries
Choose from 100+templates to showcase your media in style.
Video Messaging
Record, and send personalized video messages.
CincoTube
Create your own community video hub your team, students or fans.
Pages
Create dedicated webpages to share your videos and images.
Live
Create dedicated webpages to share your videos and images.
For Developers
Video API
Build a unique video experience.
DeepUploader
Collect and store user content from anywhere with our file uploader.
Solutions
Solutions
Enterprise
Supercharge your business with secure, internal communication.
Townhall
Webinars
Team Collaboration
Learning & Development
Creative Professionals
Get creative with a built in-suite of editing and marketing tools.
eCommerce
Boost sales with interactive video and easy-embedding.
Townhall
Webinars
Team Collaboration
Learning & Development
eLearning & Training
Host and share course materials in a centralized portal.
Sales & Marketing
Attract, engage and convert with interactive tools and analytics.
"Cincopa helped my Enterprise organization collaborate better through video."
Book a Demo
Resources
Resources
Blog
Learn about the latest industry trends, tips & tricks.
Help Centre
Get access to help articles FAQs, and all things Cincopa.
Partners
Check out our valued list of partners.
Product Updates
Stay up-to-date with our latest greatest features.
Ebooks, Guides & More
Customer Stories
Hear how we've helped businesses succeed.
Boost Campaign Performance Through Video
Discover how to boost your next campaign by using video.
Download Now
Pricing
Watch a Demo
Demo
Login
Start Free Trial
Video-on-demand (VOD) platforms require fast and reliable frontend deployments, low-latency edge delivery, and seamless integration with external video processing and storage services. As neither Vercel nor Netlify provides native media storage, encoding pipelines, or adaptive streaming distribution. These platforms serve as orchestration and delivery layers rather than complete video infrastructures. The decision between Vercel and Netlify therefore depends on where a platform places emphasis: frontend rendering and edge-side logic in the case of Vercel, or ingestion workflows and multi-framework integration in the case of Netlify. Hosting Model Vercel Designed for Next.js, Vercel deploys apps to its edge network with minimal configuration. This works well for video dashboards and portals but forces large video files onto external services like S3 or Cloudflare R2. The frontend-first model makes sense if the priority is UI performance rather than raw media handling. Netlify Uses a JAMstack-first approach with static builds and serverless execution. Its build caching speeds up deployments of video catalogs with thousands of entries. However, like Vercel, video assets cannot be hosted natively, so external storage/CDN is required. This model is efficient if you prioritize static performance for catalog-heavy platforms. Media Storage and Handling Vercel Lacks object storage. Large video uploads must go to external buckets or APIs. Hosting full VOD libraries directly on Vercel is impractical because of bandwidth limits and cost. This makes Vercel better suited to managing metadata, playlists, and UI rather than storing raw streams. Netlify Offers Large Media (Git LFS), but it is designed for binary assets under version control, not segmented HLS/DASH streams. For actual playback workflows, storage must be offloaded. Netlify works best as the layer controlling access and presentation rather than video storage itself. Serverless Functions Vercel Supports serverless functions through API routes. Useful for on-the-fly video token generation, signed URLs, or webhooks for transcoding pipelines. Limited execution time (50s max) makes it unsuitable for heavy video processing. Example : Vercel serverless function generating a signed URL // Vercel API route for signed playback URL export default function handler(req, res) { const url = generateSignedUrl('vod/movie.mp4', { expiresIn: '1h' }); res.json({ url }); } Execution is capped at ~50s, which is too short for transcoding but sufficient for authentication workflows tied to video playback. Netlify Functions have similar limits but add background functions (up to 15 minutes). These can trigger transcoding jobs or coordinate with encoding APIs: // Netlify Background Function: trigger encoding exports.handler = async (event, context) => { await callEncodingService(event.file); return { statusCode: 200, body: 'Encoding started' }; }; This makes Netlify more flexible when video ingestion or processing needs to be automated. Adaptive Streaming Workflow (HLS/DASH) Vercel No built-in support for adaptive streaming. Integrations with services like AWS MediaConvert are required. Vercel’s role is typically issuing playback credentials and serving the frontend player. Netlify Also lacks native HLS/DASH support but can coordinate ingestion workflows via background functions. This makes Netlify slightly better for tying frontend deployment with transcoding pipelines, though playback still depends on external CDNs. CDN and Edge Delivery Vercel Runs on its own Vercel Edge Network and integrates deeply with Next.js middleware. Developers can enforce geofencing or token checks at the edge before a request hits the video CDN, reducing latency for protected content. Netlify Uses a global CDN with edge functions built on Deno. Similar rules can be applied to secure or route video requests, and the framework-agnostic model works well for projects not tied to Next.js. Developer Tooling Vercel Provides first-class integration with Next.js , including zero-configuration deployments, middleware execution at the edge, and automatic preview environments for each code branch. Its CLI ( Vercel CLI ) supports project initialization, local testing of serverless routes, and direct deployment commands. Build times are optimized for Next.js projects using incremental static regeneration and server-side rendering pipelines. Environment variable management and secret storage are integrated into the dashboard and CLI, allowing secure handling of playback tokens or API keys. Observability tools capture function logs, request traces, and real-time performance metrics, which are particularly useful when debugging video session authentication flows. Netlify Maintains framework-agnostic tooling, with its CLI ( Netlify CLI ) enabling local testing of serverless functions, edge functions, and redirects before deployment. Developers can simulate function invocation locally, which is important for verifying signed URL generation or stream access control logic. Build plugins allow customization of build steps for linking encoding APIs, automating upload scripts, or syncing media catalogs to external storage. Environment variable management supports both CLI and UI-level configurations. Netlify’s build settings allow fine-grained control of caching, useful in scenarios where large video catalogs require fast rebuilds without re-fetching all metadata. Its log system aggregates build logs, invocation traces, and background execution records, making it possible to validate ingestion pipelines without relying on third-party monitoring services. Cost Considerations Vercel Free tier has strict bandwidth limits. Paid plans increase bandwidth but VOD workloads often exceed thresholds quickly. The platform is economical for authentication and UI delivery but unsuited to large-scale video serving. Netlify Similar bandwidth limits. However, background functions can reduce the need for separate orchestration servers, slightly lowering costs for teams building automated ingestion pipelines. Bandwidth for actual video delivery must still come from a CDN. Which Fits VOD Better? Vercel Best if the stack is built around Next.js and the priority is fast, customizable frontends with secure edge logic. Suitable when storage, transcoding, and delivery are already handled externally. Netlify Better if the stack spans multiple frameworks or if ingestion/transcoding workflows need automation. Background functions make it a stronger choice for small to mid-size VOD platforms coordinating with external encoding services. Final Verdict Vercel & Netlify aren’t replacements for a complete VOD infrastructure. They work as orchestration layers to manage deployment pipelines, user interfaces, and access control, while video storage, transcoding, and adaptive delivery remain external. Vercel aligns with projects that require optimized Next.js deployment and fine-grained edge logic enforcement. Netlify presents a strong option when development spans multiple frameworks or when ingestion and encoding workflows require automation through extended background functions.
Video Hosting
Image Hosting
Galleries
Video Messaging
CincoTube
Pages
Live
